Board Thread:Moderation Desk/@comment-644222-20150815034345/@comment-30698228-20150817103937

Yes, of course minor edits would be the downside to the page. I know I certainly rejoice when somebody edits out a few mistakes I overlook, haha. Removes my ego, I suppose!

Yes, several pages have been locked, including Berenal's own page last time I read it (Which I believe was...three days ago?). So evidently it's still in use and seems to working!!

In my honest opinion, locking an authors content should also be within the authour's power, however only restricted to pages they have created; as authour's are typically the page's custodian.

E.g, I could have the power to say...Lock my HMS Heartbringer (II) page as it is private (fanon), but I could not lock the Grand Alliance Navy page as it is a public page. This would mean that any content I do not want edit is safe, and I as the authour hold the power to do as I please with the content I create as is the "right" of an authour, provided I do not go autocratic with that power. Authour's of fanon content hold the primary power over their content and as such, should regulate it how they fit, within boundaries of course and with Admin supervision. At least, that's how I see power within these wiki, excluding a large number of variables (Behavior, type of content etc.)

Anyway...I droned a little too much on that, but hey! Public discussion.