Talk:Kingdom of Kul Tiras/@comment-7263041-20140611062156/@comment-7263041-20140611063715

As you can see by the links that I've presented above. It is quite clear, in fact non-disputable, that Tandred is a non-canon character. Now normally I'd be all for using the RPG for RP inspiration. When you're creating a new character you can take ideas from prestige classes, or work in a new, unseen monster from the monster manual for your character to defeat either by themselves or as part of a campaign. The options are for the most part, endless.

However in this particular case, we have loreology, which happens to be the main source for lore confirmation at the moment (acting as the middle man between us and the creative developers to get our questions answered) clearly stating that Tandred will not be a canon character. This means that despite earlier source material, he is a non-entity. He cannot be used.

As this wiki is one for storytelling and lore, I personally think that non-canon references (such as this one) should be left out. There is a difference between canon, non-canon and fanon. Tandred Proudmoore, to put it simply is advanced non-canon.

Now if Blizzard somewhere down the line when we finally get access to Kul Tiras, decides to reverse their thinking and make Tandred canon, then that's fine, I have no issues with that. However for now I stand by what I said, that as he is not canon, he cannot be recognized as the IC leader of Kul Tiras.