Talk:Human/@comment-14266067-20130802165438/@comment-207.180.167.75-20130802171556

I'm not saying that there shouldn't be both fanon and canon on this wiki. I really enjoy all the stories and histories created by the roleplayers of this server. The primary problem I see is mixing fanon and canon together with no distinction as to which is which. There is nothing wrong with having the wiki both be a proper source for actual lore and a source to read up on player-created fanon.

Either literal canonical articles should not exist (which isn't really an option in this context), or player-created lore should be clearly noted. Otherwise, it appears as if everything is being passed off as canon. When I go from one article talking about Varian Wrynn to another talking about the Stormwind War for Independence, how should I know which parts are totally made up? I thin it is a much better protocol to simply label non-canonical articles. It doesn't take anything away from them and it takes two seconds to add a copied and pasted disclaimer.