Thread:Digman14/@comment-24827457-20150108040253/@comment-24827457-20150108050145

Articles "blatant copied and pasted from WoWpedia" are indeed done so for the purpose of clearly adapting from their information from the site most commonly respected as a valid source of go-to lore.

You can draw the line you mentioned, that's fine. However, jumping onto another's page (specifically the Azerothian Heroes) to enforce such a line is not acceptable in my own eyes, especially when the guy who wrote that made it clear that it was his page and didn't want the main idea he wrote down to be altered freely.

It's interesting that you refer to me being condescending. I'll respond to that comment as being hypocritical. Every discussion you've gotten into with Aretain or me has been nothing but condescending on your part. Do you seriously think we haven't read books, or don't keep up with the timeline? Are you clearly so much greater than either of us that you can assume we're just blowing nonsense and that you're absolutely correct?

"In short, as long it's not fan-made: I probably know more about it than you do." I do not think you have the right to define me along the lines of arrogant as long as lines like this exist on your profile and your edits.

You made your purpose clear enough, and what you intend is fine. Once the issue is cleared up, then there should be no problem with editing canon articles for clarity, as long as you are not removing substantial content originally written by others. However, I will again urge something, this in particular to be changing your approach to things. If you think me to be arrogant or condescending, I'd like you to take one more look at your profile and your past comments.