Thread:Berenal Grayblade/@comment-30698228-20150704045659/@comment-644222-20150704200755

Admiral Ranets Daggerfang wrote: And by your people? Would it be so prudent to know what their criticism is? I said it in my post and on the page. It's been criticized for literally just being a drudgeboat with alliance flags on it. There are people who think the Alliance is better than just copying the orcs.

As to the Kingdom of Gilneas stuff, no I don't care if you add to the page? Just like you don't own the navy, I don't own Gilneas. That might be where we do the majority of our RP respectively but neither of us has right to dictate what can and cannot be added to lore pages. What I'd done wasn't, and as you can see by your own words, a massive "heap of edits" it was literally one line. In your hypothetical scenario it's sounding like you'd erase my work and put in your own. I'd have an issue if you went in and erased my work, yes, but if you merely added onto the page that's not a problem. '''Once more, I don't own Gilneas. Nor do you own the navy.'''

I get that you RP in your circle as being a pretty high up naval officer, but that doesn't mean you have the right to basically dictate what can and cannot be added to pages of lore, even if you were the one who created the page. That'd be like Maxen saying you can't edit the Kingdom of Stormwind page or, as you put it, myself saying you can't edit the Kingdom of Gilneas page to place in your own stuff.

You can request people refrain from editing your own original content. Examples, as you'd stated in your first response, being that of how I'd requested people refrain from adding to things like the Raven-class or the Glory-class which do not exist in lore and only in fanon. The carrier, however, is quite literally something straight from the garrison shipyard.