Talk:Lelend Smith/@comment-4681356-20151006132450

In the event there is a dispute between the innovator of a character page and the owner of the character page, there is regrettably no set guideline. Any contribution that is made the the wikia, I think, cannot be revoked merely on a whim unless it was revoked for a good reason, especially in the case of authorship of a character page.

But, in order to deal with this current situation fairly, we have to look at a few things...

1) whether or not the edit (in this case, blanking the page) was made in good faith,

2) whether or not the characters of the innovator are mentioned in the article,

3) whether or not the character's owner is all right with the deletion, and

4) the history of the page to determine the contributions of both the presumed innovator and owner.

Obviously, blanking a character page against the owner's will cannot be said to be done in good faith. None of Wolfie407's characters were mentioned. The owner of the character is not all right with the deletion. After reviewing the history, it looks like User:Wolfie407 put the template in the page. That's it. Everything else appears to be added by Lelend, who in this case now, is both the innovator and the owner of the page.

I'm restoring this page. No one owns a page because they started it and put a template in place, especially not a character page of another person. The wikia is not a battelground. If you two want to work something else out between the two of you, feel free; but insofar that the wikia customs and rules go, the page was wrongfully blanked and will be restored.