Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-4681356-20130822154345/@comment-7263041-20130823015545

Actually, if you'd have read my posts on this tag, I clearly said that while it was necessary it wasn't required on 'every' page, and I actually think it should have been pruned to be more visually appealing.

The problem wasn't the tag itself, it was the fact that it was being applied to almost every page on the wiki. Rather than fix the problem (by removing the tag on the pages where it was not necessary) you removed the entire tag. Unnecessary, blind, foolish... three words that pretty much sum up your decision making on this matter.

But as you said, my objection has been noted. I'll just be sure in the future to add disclaimer tags to pages where I believe they are necessary. Not as obtrusive as the tag you nuked, but existing none the less to remove any confusion readers might have.