Talk:Church of the Holy Light/@comment-4681356-20150902170325/@comment-23180510-20150902182503

I'll be merging the articles later today when I have a chance. Great, and it is appreciated considering that via this wikia's administrator standards that canon lore is put before fanon and not some make believe machination. But I will assert that the first article is entirely fair in its presentation of the Archbishop claim and even offers an internal disclaimer, and the only real content the (lore) page adds is a copy/paste from WoWpedia, which is generally frowned upon. '''By who? In all honesty you could just be saying that it's frowned upon. I did it because I felt that there wasn't an accurate representation of the lore group "The Church of the Holy Light". Feel free to argue the point, but anything I've found has had this particular line of fanon a bit too engrained. Blizzard changes guild names if they are lore groups, and considering you guys have been using the Blizzard ToS as a basis for banning people I would imagine the same carries over for canon representations that don't have fanon strewn into the mix.'''

The conventions that exist on every page for every lore organization have been met. Why hold this page to a higher "canon" standard? It isn't picking on you in particular, I'm planning on being more involved in the wikia and since this RP happens to fall within the same theme of RP I RP It's only natural for me to find this first. Next comes (lore) COB pages to support the Declaration of Unitynonsense. Quit it with your slippery slope banter, it's unbecoming of an administrator. This is becoming a bit of a habit. No, this is me being involved with the Wikia on behalf of my own accord.The wikia is not a tool to undermine the role-play of other people by whitewashing articles to be "canon only." '''This has nothing to do with being canon only. Why don't you take a look at what I posted here: '''http://moon-guard.wikia.com/wiki/Ruleset_for_Moon_Guard_Wiki_Administrators#Hierarchy_of_Wiki_Canon

It seems like you didn't esign the admin rules, by the way.

If you have an actual in-character alternative to present, though, you're free to put it here.''' It's not about having an alternative, its about making it abundantly clear that there can be alternatives. The issue with people splicing their fanon together with a lore organization is that it gives the illusion that it's no longer possible. How many "Church of the Holy Light" pages can I make? Only one, and that one has no seperation or disambiguation.'''

Also, does the SHC no longer subscribe to the church community's role-play? I talked to Leedra last night, and she was insistent that the SHC remained loyal members of the church. I ask because perhaps if that could be cleared up, the impulse for white-washing articles would be extinct. This has nothing to do with the SHC to be honest, and via Skype, PM, etc. would be a better platform for that instead of trying to put someone on the spot.