Talk:Silver Fist Keep/@comment-7263041-20160206110159/@comment-6335668-20160209082233

"While there is no evidence that supports the idea that there were no wars between Gilneas and Lordaeron, I will ask the reverse question. Why should the other five be fighting amongst themselves?"

When have multiple nations of men ever shared a border in total and complete peace for the entire time of their existence? Do you propose that the Seven Kingdoms, other than Stromgarde and Alterac, were at peace with each other for, oh, a thousand years?

"Just because two nations skirmish and war doesn't mean the others have to follow suit."

No, but it does establish a precedent that all was not at peace between the Seven Kingdoms prior to the Second War.

"We will never know if there were any though, not unless Blizzard expands on pre-first war lore for those nations. That doesn't mean people can't create a fanon war, but that's all it is, fanon, and I won't recognize it,"

Well then maybe don't harass people who want to, like you're doing on this page. Seriously - you don't want to recognize it, fine, but don't come to the pages of people who do and tell them 'there was never a war this is impossible'.

"because I consider it a clash with what has already been established."

Except it doesn't, because as the lore shows, there were pre-second war conflicts among the human nations. What it clashes with is your idea of a peaceful seven kingdoms, which has less support than the idea of one not at peace. Namely, it has none, while not-at-peace has some.