Talk:Grand Alliance Piracy Act/@comment-71.81.230.226-20151227000227/@comment-7263041-20151227052103

Funny how you demand respect in the same post where you literally act like a colossal dick to everyone regardless of what they've posted Ranets, you generally don't get to show severe disrespect to everyone and still expect people to play nice after the fact.

I made an observation based on what limited knowledge I have about legal acts, and what I know about Admiral Taylor's rank at the time of ratification. I said that I was confused, because I was. Simply put, it didn't make sense for his name to be there, not with the terminology used. If it is an act, then it is law and doesn't need to be signed by additional admirals after ratification, not unless there is a significant change made, the entire act redrafted, signed and ratified again.

If it was say, a contract, a binding agreement between currently serving Admirals to chase after pirates, then yes, additional signatures would be acceptable, but it would no longer apply to the entire navy, just those Admirals.

The points I have made, as far as I am aware are valid. Treating me, and other posters like garbage for raising said posts is unacceptable conduct.