User blog comment:Aretain King/The Seven Kingdoms and War/@comment-644222-20160211000226

I'm afraid I don't agree with this considering that as per history, you can go to war with someone and later be their ally. (See the US and Britain if you need a really blatant example). In addition you're dismissing hostility between Gilneas and Kul Tiras which was apparent by way of Genn and Daelan repeatedly threatening each other (with violence, as per Day of the Dragon).

A lack of evidence is -not- safe to assume something didn't happen, if anything it's neutral ground. There's nothing for or against, but in this case you're laying out the need for burden of proof on your side, which I don't really see in the Lordaeron argument. You can be a long reigning successful king and have declared countless wars (See Louis XIV). Peace and prosperity usually refers to internal peace, not necessarily external.

I'm not saying that there was 100% definitely wars between the people, but for the longest time you've been trying to stifle the idea that there could have been any while relying almost exclusively on the argument that we don't have written lore proof of it. We don't have a lot of proof on things if you want to go that route but we can generally assume some of it happened based on context. Canonically we cannot prove that it did or didn't happen just because Blizzard doesn't tell us these things.