Thread:Lord Maxen Montclair/@comment-6335668-20131201054200/@comment-644222-20131201224159

I don't believe that means the removal of all articles pertaining to the Council. Rather, I believe the solution of just marking such and such as Council of Bishops is enough no? And a claimant is someone that stakes claim to a throne or position that is vacant while also being seen with opposition/is not seen as the official head of state/holder of the seat by all outside of their circle.

In the example of Blood of Lordaeron, Madelynne is a claimant to the throne as her claim is contested and she has yet to fully claim all of Lordaeron under her rule. In the case of the Archbishop one might call him a claimant to the seat due to the fact that the CoB is not seen by all to be the ruling body of the church/there is a contestment of it. If you do not wish to place the claimant role on the seat that's fine, I don't believe it's proper given that Claimant is relative to that of a royal throne or position of power within a kingdom's ruling not the church. Rather it would be a division within the church for there to be people seeing the Archbishop as illegitimate; not a claim. His seat is validated through the sect he belongs to which is not a claim; it is a schism. Claimant is not the proper term for this.