Thread:Lord Maxen Montclair/@comment-1196363-20140320144859/@comment-5722194-20140320170342

Ashvale wrote: Lord Maxen Montclair wrote: Whether the claims of the assassination plot were true, if Moorwhelp wishes for a more neutral account of the situation that presents them moreso as allegations than truth, I think he has a right to request such of the article. So now we're telling people how they should tell their stories? IC facts are IC facts. I don't ask other people to edit their stories, because I don't like what I've read. Moorwhelp is more than welcome to write anything he wants on his own wiki page, but asking Caspius to edit his story when he has done nothing but supply the facts as they are IC is utterly ridiculous.

If Moorwhelp doesn't like people knowing his character is a corrupt Bishop, perhaps he should not have RPed him as a corrupt Bishop--or at least done a better job of hiding it. There is IC proof of every single allegation in Caspius' story. I've seen it with my own eyes, and so have others. That you've never asked people to edit their pages that mentioned you is a lie. You on multiple occasions asked people to delete content from their pages because they mentioned your guild or organizations in a negative light.

Whatever. I'm done with this issue. The page is locked.