Talk:Ten Virtues/@comment-7263041-20150425004103/@comment-7263041-20150426144515

As long as the page remains benign and doesn't directly reference the ROAK scam, I think it should be safe to remain on the wiki. Maybe change who signed it to another Magistrate so that there are no links to Rengshaw on the article. If he decides to come in here (provided he hasn't been permanetly banned, which at time of commenting he has not) and edit the page to make it volatile, then by all means, remove it at that point.

These ten virtues could be used in light based RP by more responsible people. However, none of us can repurpose what is written here, because to do so would be an act of plagarism. Even if this article were to be deleted before someone else reposted, it would still be considered plagarism.

I mean honestly if I could repurpose it I would, that way this page could be deleted and the virtues preserved, but I don't want to cross that line, because it sets a negative tone for future plagarism conflicts, where plagarists can look back on any article repurposing this work and saying "It's okay for him to do it.." and it's even worse if an Admin is involved.

End of the day though, this is the call of the admins. I will not step in the way of their ruling. I'd like to see the page stay as long as it remains on topic and completely free of ROAK / Athelstaan references, but if the admins feel that it is too volatile to do so, so be it.