Board Thread:Moderation Desk/@comment-74.12.36.252-20150903134038/@comment-5722194-20150903150830

In the current policy, individuals who are banned have their editing/commenting privileges revoked while their content remains on the wiki. If the content on their article is inflammatory or against our policies, then it will definitely be taken down as usual. The way I see it, this is effective in that having your editing/commenting abilities revoked is a massive inconvenience and forces offenders to be humbled and go to others if they want want their content posted.

I strongly disagree with putting disclaimers on people's articles for the sole purpose of highlighting their personal conduct. The concept opens up an extremely slippery slope that I have no doubt would evolve into hairy edit wars and contests over wording.

One thing that is currently being discussed is locking specific character pages of users from editing if they are banned. I personally feel that guild pages should not be locked unless they contain blatantly off-the-wall offensive content since I feel that not all members of a guild should be punished for the actions of one member.