Board Thread:Moderation Desk/@comment-11824856-20140319141533/@comment-18468608-20140320015009

Rainbird777 wrote: She would not be considered decent, appearing on the street in public like this, you'd be pulling your children aside and shielding their eyes. The pose and the nudity are not tasteful, and the only context is sexuality, period. I object to my gender being objectified this way. Why is this okay? Becauuuuse she's not on the street? Good grief, if a naked woman was rising out of the bath in the middle of a street I'd be a bit concerned, but she's not. At least not by the standard of this picture. From the context of the photo to what you're saying... I'm sorry, it's a little stupid.

As for objectfying women? I'm a woman, and I don't feel objectified by this in the slightest. As many people have said: yes, it's tacky, but it's no more so than other pictures specified and it doesn't show any full nudity. Do her breasts look fake? Yeah, I'd agree to that. Is she what a "standard" beauty is? Yeah, probably. But of all the social justice issues to argue, and you're going to go with this one? C'mon, there are bigger things to worry about than a woman rising out a bath. Men and women have been drawn in the past in far more nudity and provocative positions for art. I could find a dozen more things that offend me then this one photo on the wiki.